Stephen A. Kent (Ph.D.)
Department of Sociology
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA
T6G 2H4
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
June 30, 1997
For the record, I did not have any contact with German parliamentary officials as I was preparing my talk. For about ten minutes I spoke by telephone with one German professor who is involved with the current discussion about the organization, but we only touched briefly on issues related to Scientology. The German Kirchentag paid my air fare and my hotel in Leipzig, and Berliner Dialog is covering some of my expenses, but they are not paying me a fee or honorarium. I prepared my talk while in Canada, and did not consult with anyone in Germany or elsewhere about its content. I had complete freedom to write whatever I wanted around the general topic of the debate about Scientology's religious claims.
As a person trained in religious studies, I find the debate about Scientology's alleged religious nature to be an interesting and important one. It should not be, however, the only issue over which we evaluate the German American debate over Scientology's religious claims. Intimately related to the religious question are human rights questions. Some people assume that religious practice is a guaranteed human right, but even a superficial examination of world events shows that many atrocities occur in the name of God or religion. Universally, therefore, religious belief must receive absolute protection, but religious practice stemming from that belief must receive protection only until it begins to violate the rights of its members or nonmembers. Following from this last point, I argue that even if Scientology contains a theology and cosmology that some members interpret religiously, its organizational actions and behaviours raise serious human rights questions. Without wanting to review the pronouncements from all German officials about the organization, I conclude that the German government has good reason to investigate Scientology's activities in this country. It also has compelling reasons to inquire about the well-being of German citizens in Scientology facilities in the United States and elsewhere. I will share just a few of the documents that led me to these conclusions, and some of them are available in numerous world wide web sites on the "internet."
In fact, I have made precisely the argument that Wilson dismisses. In a study that Berliner Dialog (Heft 1-97) translated into German, and in another study that I hope to publish soon, I show that L. Ron Hubbard (Scientology's founder) claimed that Scientology was a religion because he saw the claim as a marketing device to make money and avoid taxes (Kent, 1997b: 25ff; Miller, 1987: 199-203, 220) as well as a way "to reduce the likelihood of governmental interventions against it for allegedly practising medicine without a license" (Kent, 1996: 30). Moreover, Scientology denies its reputedly religious nature if it is attempting to enter a country that might react adversely to religious proselytization (such as Japan or Greece [Kent, 1997a: 18-19]). Nevertheless, the historical reasons behind Scientology's religious claims, as well as the organization's selectivity in making the claims, do not diminish the probability that many Scientologists view their commitment as a religious one.
From a social scientific perspective, and probably from a legal one as well, the objective "truth" of an ideology is not the determinant of a group's "religious" designation. Mere belief in supernatural beings or forces may be enough to get an ideology designated as religious, even if the origins or doctrines of the belief system are highly suspect. Along these lines, the inspirational figure in the sociology of religion, Max Weber, refused to exclude charlatans from his identification of charismatic figures, since the devotion of followers was a far more salient fact than authenticity. After mentioning two types of charismatic figures, Weber added that "[a]nother type is represented by Joseph Smith, the founder of Mormonisn, who may have been a very sophisticated swindler (although this cannot be definitely established)" (Weber, 1968: 242). Similarly, from a social scientific perspective, a belief system is religious if it contains supposedly supernatural elements, regardless of the accuracy of those elements. Perhaps unlike Joseph Smith, Hubbard's sophisticated swindle has been definitely exposed by a number of critics (for example, Atack, 1990; Kent, 1996; Miller, 1987) who have shown that his religious alignment was purely expedient, but now many of his followers see their lives in the context of the doctrines that he developed.
As these current film productions suggest, Scientology is eager to be involved with projects that disseminate its ideology to nonmembers through high profile cultural undertakings. One vital aspect of this dissemination effort involves cultivating the conversion and support of society's cultural celebrities. Beginning in 1955, Hubbard's "Project Celebrity" targeted what he called "prime communicators" with the hope that they would "mention" Scientology "now and again" ([Hubbard], 1955). By 1992, thirteen "celebrity centres" existed around the world (Church of Scientology International, 1992: 353), and their purpose was "[t]o fully utilize opinion leaders and Scientologists to permeate society and get all the different publics utilizing LRH's Technology in every aspect..." (Jentzsch and Foster, 1977: 1). This organizational push to get everyone using Hubbard's so-called technology has dramatic secular implications for such issues of how to organize an office, how to generate and handle money, and how to measure office growth. It presumably also may have implications for people's supernatural belief systems, but it is understandable that critics see Scientology celebrities as participating in the dissemination of secular Scientology goals.
In addition to free publicity for Scientology, celebrities also give large financial contributions back to the organization. Had Scientologist Chick Corea, for example, received money from the Baden-Wurttemberg state culture ministry for performing at state-sponsored events, then some of that income may have become part of his contributions to the International Association of Scientologists. The avowed purpose of this organization is "[t]o unite, advance, support and protect the Scientology religion and Scientologists in all parts of the world, so as to achieve the Aims of Scientology as originated by L. Ron Hubbard" (International Association of Scientologists, 1995: [back cover]). In one of the Association's 1995 magazines, both he and actress Kirstie Alley each appeared as having contributed US$100,000 (Church of Scientology Celebrity Centre International, 1995: 8; International Association of Scientologists Administration, 1995: 49, see 60). By comparison, the $2,000 contribution that John Travolta made seems small (Church of Scientology Celebrity Centre International, 1996: 8; see International Association of Scientologists Administration, 1995: 60). What Germans will want to know, however, is that this organization provided grants to the Church of Scientology International in order to fund the series of anti-Germany ads in the New York Times and the Washington Post (both beginning, I believe, on September 15, 1994). Utilizing cultural productions and prominent cultural figures, therefore, to disseminate all aspects of Hubbard's so-called tech is an intimate aspect of the organization's overall public relations and (it would seem) financial strategies.
Regardless of how Scientology portrays these claims, they are medical ones that purport to offer a social service, but one about which experts remain highly critical. In the American state of Oklahoma, for example, a 1991 mental health board examined a Narconon program and concluded that "there is substantial credible evidence, as found by the Board, that the Narconon Program is unsafe and ineffective" (Mental Health Board, 1991; reproduced in Lobsinger, 1991: 58).
One aspect of Scientology's efforts to eradicate psychiatry and replace it with its own techniques is that members can take a course (called a rundown) that claims to teach members how to cure psychosis. Called the "Introspection Rundown Auditor Course," this course supposedly "factually handles the last of the 'unsolvable' conditions which can trap a person -- the psychotic break. And end forever the 'reason' psychs were kept around with their icepicks and shock machines" (Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization, 1992: [2]). This course is based upon what Hubbard described as "a technical breakthrough which possibly ranks with the major discoveries of the Twentieth Century." The consequence of this alleged breakthrough was that "THIS MEANS THE LAST REASON TO HAVE PSYCHIATRY AROUND IS GONE" (Hubbard, 1974: 346). The self-proclaimed "breakthrough" involved isolating the person having the psychotic breakdown while not speaking to the person, giving the person particular vitamins and minerals, determining what incident triggered the illness, then putting the person through a long and complex series of Scientology "counselling" sessions (called auditing) that focus on the triggering incident Hubbard, 1974: 353).
Currently this course is at the centre of controversy involving the December 5, 1995 death of Scientologist Lisa McPherson in Clearwater, Florida. After a minor car accident, McPherson exhibited bizarre behaviour -- publicly undressing, speaking in monotone with a fixed stare, exhibiting forgetfulness and confusion, and crying. Against medical advice, she signed herself out of a hospital and into the care of visiting Scientology "friends" who took her to the organization's Fort Harrison Hotel. Seventeen days later, Scientologists took her back to a somewhat distant hospital where a doctor was working who was a Scientologist, and he pronounced her dead. A police investigation continues over her death, but McPherson's estate launched a lawsuit that accused Scientology "of allowing McPherson to languish in a coma without nutrition and liquids while she was in isolation as part of an Introspection Rundown" (Tobin, 1997: 12A). In this context, a Scientology lawyer acknowledged "that the Introspection Rundown remains 'part of church services'" (Tobin, 1997: 12A). Undoubtedly, therefore, Scientology practices pseudo-psychiatry, and the lawsuit over McPherson's death may establish the extent to which at least one of these practices can have potentially fatal consequences.
Indication of organizationally influenced damage caused by Sea Org parents to their children formed the basis of a critical article that appeared in a major newspaper of the Florida city near to where the Scientology organization called Flag is based. In November, 1991, the St. Petersburg Times ran a long article entitled, "Scientology's Children," and it contained an excerpt about a German mother and her son:
The Kleinbergs' account about limited family time also rings true because of a series of internal memos (of which I have copies) from Scientology's Pacific Area Command (in Los Angeles, California) beginning in early November, 1989. These memos centre around an Executive Directive that the commanding officer issued which abolished the one hour nightly family time. He cited two reasons for doing so. First, he claimed, "[a] thorough research [sic] revealed that there is no LRH [L. Ron Hubbard] reference covering Sea Org members taking 1 hour family time per day. Also to have such break in schedules in the middle of production has been found to be detrimental to production...." Instead he wanted people to work the extra hour a day in order to build up their production output so that they would receive a "liberty day" (Gouessan, 1989) once every two weeks (Shapiro, 1989).
Several parents objected, and their objections were revealing. One person asked rhetorically, "[h]ow can one keep track of one's child without even an hour a day with the child? I HAVE seen staff distracted by NOT caring for their children and this time could be well utilized for this" (Swartz, 1989). Another person cited the text of a Hubbard tape where Scientology's founder complained about a condition that he had seen (and which he said had existed in the Pacific Area Command): "I wish somebody would tell me why we consistently had to ORDER parents to see their children when they hadn't seen them for weeks" (Hubbard, Transcript of LRH Taped Briefing to CS-& and Pers Comm 22 Sept 73; attached to Shapiro, 1989). This same person acknowledged in his letter of protest that "[i]n the 19 years I have been in the Sea Org in PAC this condition (parental neglect, etc.) has several times been the source of major upset and enturbulation [agitation] on Church lines" (Shapiro, 1989 [round brackets in original]). Taken together, the interview material, media accounts, internal policy directive, and responses point to the fact that parents' time with their children is severely constrained and sometimes eliminated because of the organizational pressure and job demands under which Sea Org members work. It seems that Scientology, in its Sea Org manifestation, becomes something akin to an alternative or "fictive" family structure to its members (see Cartwright and Kent, 1992: 348-349), receiving more time and commitment than their own children.
On a related point, the new Sea Org family to which adults devote their lives may at times place children in medically detrimental situations. This fictive family may not always be a medically responsible one. The informant whom I interviewed in 1978, for example, complained to me that "the nursery conditions were terrible." She complained that, in one nursery room, "there were, I think, sixteen babies in the room, all under a year old, and throughout the whole day, there were three nannies who did shifts in that room, looking after sixteen babies all under a year old" (Kent interview with Fern, 1987: 48). Under these conditions, children developed medical problems (according to my informant, Fern), because the facility did not have an isolation nursery. Consequently, common childhood illnesses (such as ear infections) spread rapidly among the children and remained in the nursery population for a long time. To support her assertion, this informant showed me medical records that she kept of her child's visits to doctors while the child was under nursery care, and compared them with similar records from after the time that she and her child left Sea Org and the nursery arrangement. The child made seventeen visits to the doctor's office during an eight month period while in the nursery, then only four visits in the twenty-nine months following the family's departure from the organization (Kent interview with Fern, 1987: 49-50).
Researchers always must be cautious in accepting as fact the account of a single person, but I heard similar stories about the condition of children's facilities in Scientology's child care program on the other side of the American continent -- Los Angeles, California. The person who related the account had occasion to visit the children's facility (called the Cadet Org) in the late 1970s or early 1980s, and she saw an infant who was the child of a man she knew. This child, she stated:
The final example of alleged child neglect is documented in a report filed by the commanding officer of the Cadet Estates Organization in late October, 1989, concerning the hygiene of three children -- ages 4, 8, and 10 or 11. Two of the children had lice, and for one of them it was a recurring problem. A guardian was in charge of them, but she "is herself on mission quite often." [That is to say, the organization frequently sent her away on assignments.]
One of the tragedies in this debate is that normal Scientologists will feel persecuted and threatened. These people likely know nothing about RPF conditions, and they genuinely feel that Scientology involvement has benefitted them. The organization to which they belong, however, appears to be committing serious human rights abuses. Consequently, I conclude my presentation by highlighting areas of concern raised by examining the United Nations' 1948 resolution entitled The International Bill of Human Rights (United Nations, 1996b), and the 1996 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (United Nations, 1996a).
First, Scientology's procedures involving committees of evidence, sec checking, gang bang sec checking, and the two RPF programs almost certainly violate Articles 9 and 10 of the Bill. Article 9 protects people against "arbitrary arrest, detention or exile" while article 10 guarantees "a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his [sic] rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him" (United Nations, 1996: 23).
Second, Scientology's punishment of members for merely discussing the merits of Hubbard's teachings, as well as its invasive probing into people's thoughts though sec checking, almost certainly violate Articles 18 and 19 of the Bill that deal with both "the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion" and "the right to freedom of opinion and expression" (United Nations, 1996: 25).
Third, the various Scientology practices and procedures that I discussed may violate Article 17 of the Bill, which states that "[n]o one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation" (United Nations, 1996: 49).
Fourth, the conditions of the RPF and the RPF's RPF almost certainly violate Article 7 of the Covenant, which discusses "the right of everyone to the enjoyment of just and favourable conditions of work..." (United Nations, 1996a: 38). The article specifically identifies fair wages, "[a] decent living for themselves and their families..., [s]afe and healthy working conditions..., and [r]est, leisure, and reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay...." (United Nations, 1996a: 38). Indeed, many Sea Org jobs themselves may not meet these reasonable standards of propriety, safety, and fairness.
Fifth and finally, the extreme social psychological assaults and forced confessions that RPF and RPF's RPF inmates suffer almost certainly violate Article 12 of the Covenant, which recognizes "the right of everyone to enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health" (United Nations, 1996a: 18).
These and probably other serious human rights issues swirl around Scientology programs that have tax exemption and operate within the boundaries of the United States. With these serious issues in mind, the American human rights criticism of Germany's opposition to Scientology is the height diplomatic arrogance. By granting Scientology tax exemption, the United States government is cooperating with an organization that appears to put citizens from around the world at significant mental health and perhaps medical risk. While in no way do I want my remarks today to be taken as a blanket endorsement of the German government's rhetoric or tactics, on the battle with Scientology the government has the high moral ground.
Anderson, Sue. 1980. "Honorary LRH PROs Around the World!" (July 28): 8pp.
Anonymous [L. Ron Hubbard?]. 1974. "Confidential Intelligence Course." Guardian Order 1314 (September 9): 3pp.
Anthony, Dick. 1990. "Religious Movements and Brainwashing Litigation: Evaluating Key Testimony." in In Gods We Trust: New Patterns of Religious Pluralism in America. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books: 295-344.
Atack, Jon. 1990. A Piece of Blue Sky. Scientology, Dianetics, and L. Ron Hubbard Exposed. New York: Lyle Stuart.
Beckstein, Gunther. 1997. "Measures Undertaken by the
Government of the State of Bavaria Against Scientology." Posted on
Church of Scientology Celebrity Centre International. 1995.
Celebrity. Minor Issue 284.
-- -- -- . 1996. Celebrity. Minor Issue 295.
Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization. 1992. Flag
Tech News. Issue 75: 8pp.
Church of Scientology International. 1992. What Is
Scientology? Los Angeles: Bridge Publications.
-- -- -- . 1994. "Honorary PROs in Action." Hotline [The
Newsletter of L. Ron Hubbard Personal Public Relations Office
International] VI, Issue 3: 6.
-- -- -- . 1996. "Narconon Celebrating 30 Years of Saving
Lives." International Scientology News, Issue 2. Los Angeles: Church
of Scientology International.
-- -- -- . 1997. "The German Problem: Religious
Discrimination." Advertisement in George [Magazine]. (June):
100-101.
-- -- -- . Church of Scientology of California. 1978. What
is Scientology? Los Angeles: Publication Organization United States.
Cohee, Nedra. n.d. [circa 1989]. "Kids Scene in PAC." Memo:
1p.
Coryden, Bent. 1996. L. Ron Hubbard, Messiah or Madman?.
Fort Lee, New Jersey: Barricade Books.
Freedom Magazine. [1996?]. The Rise of Hatred and Violence
in Germany. [n.pl or pub.]: 167 pp.
Gabriele. 1989. "[Untitled Letter to Commanding Officer,
Pacific Area Command]." (October 24): 2pp.
Gouessan, Alain; for Vicky Zahler. 1989. "PAC Orgs Schedules
& Family Time." Executive Directive (November 6): 1p.
[Hubbard, L. Ron]. 1955. "Project Celebrity." Ability Minor
II: 2.
[Hubbard, L. Ron?]. 1955. Brain-Washing[.] A Synthesis of
the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics. Los Angeles: The American
Saint Hill Organization.
Hubbard, L. Ron. 1960. "Interrogation." Hubbard
Communications Office Bulletin (March 30): 2pp.
-- -- -- . 1961. "Johannesburg Security Check." Hubbard
Communications Office Policy Letter (April 7): 4pp.
-- -- -- . 1969. "Intelligence Actions[.] Covert
Intelligence[.] Data Collection." Confidential Memo "To the Guardian
WW [World Wide]: 5pp.
-- -- -- . 1974. "The Technical Breakthrough of 1973! The
Introversion RD." Hubbard Communications Office Bulletin of 23
January 1974 RA, Revised 10 February 1974; Revised 1 November 1974.
Reproduced in L. Ron Hubbard, 1976. The Technical Bulletins of
Dianetics and Scientology Volume VIII (1972-1975). Los Angeles:
Scientology Publications: 346-353.
-- -- -- . 1976. Modern Management Technology Defined.
Copenhagen: New Era Publications.
Hunt, Martin. 1997. "Child Cruelty in Scientology."
International Association of Scientologists Administration
[IASA]. 1995. Impact 63.
Jentzsch, Yvonne; and Harriet Foster. 1977. "Commanding
Officer[.] Public Relations Organization[.] Administration Scale."
Executive Directive SO ED 932 INT (May 31): 6pp.
Joffe, Josef. 1997. "Germany vs. the Scientologists." New
York Review of Books (April 24): 16-21.
Kent, Stephen A. 1996. "Scientology's Relationship with
Eastern Religious Traditions." Journal of Contemporary Religion 11
No. 1: 21-36; German Translations in "Scientology und ostliche
religiose Traditionen," Berliner Dialog Heft 1-97 (Ostern, 1997):
16-21; and "Scientology, religiose Anspruche und Heilungsschwindel."
Berliner Dialog Heft 1-97 (Ostern, 1997): 22-25.
-- -- -- . 1997a. "The Globalization of Scientology:
Influence, Control, and Opposition in Transnational Markets."
Unpublished Mss., 56pp.
-- -- -- . 1997b. "The Creation of 'Religious'
Scientology." Unpublished Mss., 49pp.
Kent, Stephen A. (Interviewer). 1987. "Interview with Fern
[Pseudonym, on Scientology]." (December 7): 70pp.
-- -- -- . 1994. "Interview with Robert Vaughn Young."
(August 13): 71pp.
-- -- -- . 1997. "Interview with Dennis Erlich." (March
30): 18pp.
-- -- -- . 1997. "Interview with Pat [Pseudonym, on
Scientology]." (March 12): 35pp.
-- -- -- . 1997. "Interview with Monica Pignotti." (April
6): 31pp.
Kominsky, Morris. 1970. The Hoaxers: Plain Liars, Fancy
Liars, and Damned Liars. Boston: Branden Press.
Krueger, Curtis. 1991. "Little Time for Children..." St.
Petersburg Times (November 10): 12A.
Lippman, Thomas W. 1997. "U.S. Criticizes Cermany on
Scientology." Washington Post (January 27): A1, A9.
Lobsinger, Robert W. 1991. "State Mental Health Board Denies
Narconon Certification Bid," in The Narconon Story in Oklahoma As
Recorded in the Pages of the 'Newkirk Herald Journal': 57-60.
Miller, Russell. 1987. Bare-Faced Messiah. The True Story
of L. Ron Hubbard. London: Michael Joseph.
Nefertiti [Pseudonym]. 1997. "The Church of Scientology or
the Guru's Gulags. Story of An Escape."
Reuters. 1997. "Hollywood Does Hubbard." (March 18);
downloaded from
Swartz, Fred. 1989. "PAC Orgs Schedules and Family Time"
[Letter]. (November 9): 1p. (Plus Attachments).
Tabayoyon, Andre. 1994. "Declaration of Andre Tabayoyon," in
Church of Scientology International vs. Steven Fishman and Uwe Geertz.
United States District Court, Central District of California, Case
No. CV 91 6426 HLH (Tx), (April 4): 64pp. (Plus Attachments).
Tabayoyon, Mary. 1994. "Declaration of Mary Tabayoyon," in
Church of Scientology International vs. Steven Fishman and Uwe Geertz.
United States District Court, Central District of California, Case
No. CV 91 6426 HLH (Tx), (April 4): 36pp. (Plus Attachments).
Tobin, Tom. 1997. "Scientology Had Woman in Isolation." St.
Petersburg Times [Florida, U.S.A.]. (February 21): 1Aff.
United Nations. 1996a. The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights. Geneva: United Nations.
-- -- -- . 1996b. The International Bill of Human Rights.
Geneva: United Nations.
Walker, Ens. Susan; and Lt. Art Webb, 2nd. 1977. "The
Rehabilitation Project Force." Sea Organization Flag Order 3434RB.
Re-Revised by Commodore's Messenger; Approved by L. Ron Hubbard,
Commodore. (January 7, 1974; Revised August 21, 1976;Re-Revised May
30, 1977): 14pp.
Weber, Max. 1968. Economy and Society. Volume 1. Berkeley:
University of California Press.
Weiland, Kurt. 1990. "Eradicating Psychiatry." Impact
[Magazine of the International Association of Scientologists]. Issue
33: 21.
Whitfield, Hana. 1989. "Affidavit." (August 8): 11pp,
downloaded from
Widder, William J. 1994. The Fiction of L. Ron Hubbard. Los
Angeles: Bridge Publications.
Wilson, Bryan R. [no date]. Religious Toleration & Religious
Diversity. Booklet. Santa Barbara, California: Institute for the
Study of American Religion.
-- -- -- . 1990. The Social Dimensions of Sectarianism.
Sects and New Religious Movements in Contemporary Society. Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
-- -- -- . 1994. "Expert Opinion Submitted to "Church of
Scientology International vs. Steven Fishman and Uwe Geertz, United
States District Court for the Central District of California, Case
No. 91-6426 HLH (Tx), (November 26): 10pp.
WISE International. 1994a. "News in Brief." Prosperity Magazine, Issue
36: 5.
______. 1994b. "The Purpose of WISE." Prosperity Magazine,
Issue 36: [Inside Front Cover].
Young, Stacy Brooks. 1994. "Declaration of Stacy Brooks
Young." in Church of Scientology International vs. Steven Fishman and
Uwe Geertz. United States District Court, Central District of
California, Case No. CV 91 6426 HLH (Tx), (April 4): 82pp. (Plus
Attachments).
To see more documents/articles regarding this group/organization/subject click here.